<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>

<feed xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" version="0.3" xml:lang="en-US">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026" rel="service.post" title="Lean Supply Chain News Update" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026" rel="service.feed" title="Lean Supply Chain News Update" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Lean Supply Chain News Update</title>
<tagline mode="escaped" type="text/html">Only lean supply chain news that matters.</tagline>
<link href="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/" rel="alternate" title="Lean Supply Chain News Update" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16295026</id>
<modified>2006-09-23T02:05:56Z</modified>
<generator url="http://www.blogger.com/" version="6.72">Blogger</generator>
<info mode="xml" type="text/html">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This is an Atom formatted XML site feed. It is intended to be viewed in a Newsreader or syndicated to another site. Please visit the <a href="http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=697">Blogger Help</a> for more info.</div>
</info>
<convertLineBreaks xmlns="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">true</convertLineBreaks>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026/115896577815629648" rel="service.edit" title="Aberdeen report backs adopting lean for supply chain" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://www.reliableplant.com/article.asp?pagetitle=Aberdeen%20report%20backs%20adopting%20lean%20for%20supply%20chain&amp;articleid=2721" rel="related" title="Aberdeen report backs adopting lean for supply chain" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Six Sigma News Update</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-09-23T06:55:00+08:00</issued>
<modified>2006-09-22T22:56:18Z</modified>
<created>2006-09-22T22:56:18Z</created>
<link href="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/2006/09/aberdeen-report-backs-adopting-lean.html" rel="alternate" title="Aberdeen report backs adopting lean for supply chain" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16295026.post-115896577815629648</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Aberdeen report backs adopting lean for supply chain</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span style="font-family:arial;">Author: RP news wires<br/>
<br/>Lean concepts are being extended throughout the supply chain by innovative enterprises according to a new Aberdeen Group benchmark study released this week titled "The Lean Supply Chain Report." For the study, Aberdeen surveyed more than 300 enterprises and discovered that early adopters of lean concepts have seen significant results. These results include cutting manufacturing and delivery times from several weeks to several days, and operating with virtually all inventories either in process or in motion while achieving delivery reliability that approaches 100 percent. According to Aberdeen, best-in-class performers are able to quantify the value of lean and measure their efforts towards initial investment with ROI at 33 percent.<br/>
<br/>Lean is a philosophy that espouses continuous improvement, the elimination of all forms of waste, and simplification / standardization of business processes. Its initial applications have focused on manufacturing processes. According to Aberdeen, the time has come to extend lean throughout the supply chain in order to transform from a "push" to "pull-based" model. Aberdeen identified the following as the top functional supply chain areas ripe for lean adoption:<br/>
<br/>· Supplier management and collaboration<br/>
<br/>· Supply chain planning toward demand pull<br/>
<br/>· Demand planning and demand pull lean supply chain processes<br/>
<br/>· Enterprise inventory optimization<br/>
<br/>Aberdeen further comments that enabling technology is key to orchestrate lean activities throughout the supply chain. Aberdeen recommends that lean adopters consider Web-based solutions, analytical tools and tools providing access to real-time data to further their lean supply chain efforts.</span>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026/115895075872085111" rel="service.edit" title="A Lean Supply Chain Manifesto" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://www.sdcexec.com/article_arch.asp?article_id=9040" rel="related" title="A Lean Supply Chain Manifesto" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Six Sigma News Update</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-09-23T02:43:00+08:00</issued>
<modified>2006-09-22T18:45:58Z</modified>
<created>2006-09-22T18:45:58Z</created>
<link href="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/2006/09/lean-supply-chain-manifesto.html" rel="alternate" title="A Lean Supply Chain Manifesto" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16295026.post-115895075872085111</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">A Lean Supply Chain Manifesto</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/" xml:space="preserve">&lt;span style="font-family:arial;"&gt;By Andrew K. Reese&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an age of extended global supply chains, when companies must be demand-driven and agile, what does Lean really mean?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[From Supply &amp; Demand Chain Executive, August/September 2006] Lean has hit the mainstream — sort of.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a report issued earlier this year, Boston-based technology consultancy AberdeenGroup wrote that fewer than one in five manufacturing enterprises (18 percent) have fully embraced and implemented Lean Manufacturing principles. Nevertheless, 90 percent of the manufacturing executives surveyed said that their enterprises are committed to Lean and pursuing the well-documented benefits that Lean can yield, according to "The Lean Benchmark Report."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But with Lean becoming widely accepted — if not yet widely adopted — in both discrete and process industries, the question arises, "Is Lean Manufacturing good enough anymore?" If your competitors are all reading the same business books and attending the same conference sessions explaining how to do Lean on the plant floor, will just doing Lean within the "four walls" of your enterprise still give you a competitive advantage? Or is it merely the cost of entry into the market these days?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The time is right, it seems, to take Lean outside your company. It's time for Lean Supply Chain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Necessary, But Not Sufficient&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, Lean Manufacturing has continued to prove its value over the years. For example, a study released in April by Manufacturing Insights, an advisory firm headquartered in Framingham, Mass., showed that companies with high levels of maturity in their Lean initiatives (as well as their Six Sigma programs) are achieving significant benefits and competitive advantage. "Lean companies are growing revenue more rapidly, at higher profit margins and with more productive asset usage," write Bob Parker and Jay Holman, authors of the report, "Lean Six Sigma, 1Q06 Update: Lean Continues to Show High Performance."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Manufacturing Insights report included a case study that showed how DuPont was combining Lean with Six Sigma and the Supply Chain Council's Supply Chain Operating Reference (SCOR) model to sustain momentum in its productivity improvement. In fact, Lean has always been about the supply chain to some extent. In the 1980s, when the U.S. automotive sector began implementing just-in-time production based on Lean principles derived from the Toyota Production System, a major focus was "pulling" parts and assemblies onto the production line just at the moment they were needed. Building a smooth flow of material along a streamlined value chain to eliminate waste necessarily involved suppliers, who were expected to support the OEMs' Kanban replenishment initiatives.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the focus in the automotive industry's Lean initiatives remained on optimizing within the OEM's plant. Stephanie Miles, who is vice president for commercial services at global trade management solutions provider Management Dynamics (East Rutherford, N.J.), offers a simple explanation for why this kind of internally focused Lean is necessary but no longer sufficient to compete in today's "supply chain vs. supply chain" market. "Lean can help you optimize and save five minutes out of the manufacturing process, but if it gets lost in the supply chain, you might lose five days in the delivery cycle time," says Miles. In other words, all the Lean Manufacturing in the world won't save you if you don't have your value chain in order downstream to your customer and back upstream from your suppliers. If your suppliers are holding excess inventory on a just-in-case basis to ensure that they can meet your just-in-time mandate, the cost of holding that inventory ultimately is going to get factored into the total supply chain cost for the finished product.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What Is Lean Supply Chain?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the challenges in discussing Lean Supply Chain is coming to an understanding of what exactly that phrase means. The problem is that while Lean Manufacturing has been fairly well defined as a strategy for eliminating waste through continuous improvement programs, Lean Supply Chain still means different things to different people, depending on their rank and role in the supply chain, according to Gary Latham, an APICS-certified, 20-year veteran of the automotive and transportation industries. Latham currently is director of industry marketing in the Automotive Group at WhereNet (Madison Heights, Mich.), a provider of radio frequency identification (RFID) and real-time location systems for tracking and tracing assets in the supply chain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It's really a matter of which metrics matter most to any given player in the supply chain, Latham says. "For example, if you're in charge of materials at the plant, your key metric is that you have inventory available for your production schedule, and a secondary focus would be not having too much or too little inventory. If you're the person in charge of the inbound and outbound yard at the plant, you're worried about managing all the inbound trailers, having high asset utilization and velocity in the shipping yard, and high productivity in the work force. If you're a shipper, you want to make sure that a trailer shows up on time to pick up your materials and gets it to your customer on time so that you don't get penalized, and that your materials get there undamaged."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A common theme does run through these different perspectives, however: the elimination of waste. As in Lean Manufacturing, practitioners of Lean Supply Chain focus on eliminating physical waste (in the form of inventory) and process waste (which could be, for example, unnecessary steps in a value chain or time during which assets or goods are unnecessarily idle). But unlike the internally focused Lean Manufacturing, Lean Supply Chain focuses on driving waste out of the entire value chain for a product. "To have a truly Lean supply chain, you have to go outside your four walls," says Dominick Corigliano, vice president of sales and marketing with Supply Chain Consultants, a Wilmington, Del., provider of software and services for supply chain planning and forecasting. "You have to reach out to your suppliers because there are going to be constraints present at both your suppliers and your customers."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Relationship Challenge&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Corigliano says that a truly Lean supply chain is one that is fully optimized for profitability. His colleague, Sujit Singh, chief operating officer at Supply Chain Consultants, adds that "fully optimized" means that all the parties in the supply chain not only are implementing Lean principles, they also are reaping the rewards. "When a big company directs the terms of its relationships with smaller suppliers to its own benefit, that is not a truly collaborative relationship," Singh says, "but Lean Supply Chain requires a true relationship where there actually is benefit for both sides from operating Lean." Singh is pointing to the principal challenge in implementing Lean Supply Chain: Building the right kinds of relationships with all the right partners to support Lean requires both a great deal of coordination within the supply chain and a highly collaborative attitude toward one's suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Relationship-building is necessary in Lean Supply Chain because of the data-gathering and -sharing requirements necessary to do Lean. Companies need significant amounts of data to understand the current state of supply chain processes between them and their partners; to build "as is" and "to be" models of the supply chain; to uncover gaps or redundancies that create waste; to track progress toward implementing Lean and to ensure that they are optimizing fully across the supply chain rather than isolated segments; and to monitor re-engineered processes for continuous improvement. Coordinating the collection of all that information alone represents a significant hurdle to doing Lean. "Companies are struggling with how they can coordinate with hundreds of trading partners to aggregate all that data together — it's just an enormous task," agrees Management Dynamics' Miles. She recommends breaking a Lean initiative into incremental projects with separate sets of partners, rolling the initiative out over time rather than taking a "Big Bang" approach, as a way of handling the coordination issue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A second aspect of the data challenge is simply agreeing on the metrics that partners are going to measure and share. Picking the right metrics is critical to ensure that one company is not optimizing to its own benefit and to the detriment of its suppliers or customers, explains Sridhar Tayur, CEO of Pittsburgh-based SmartOps Corp., a provider of supply chain and inventory optimization solutions. "There are many partners involved, and their metrics are different than yours," Tayur says. "Your metric might be inventory turns, but that could be a secondary metric to a dealer that focuses on on-time service for his customers. If your focus on inventory turns forces him to jack up his inventory, in the end the whole supply chain becomes 'fat.'" To address this issue, Tayur urges companies to work collaboratively with partners at the outset of a Lean initiative to establish a set of metrics that will truly reflect the efficiency of the supply chain as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Building Trust&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That level of collaboration, however, may require that companies rethink their relationships with their partners. "Communication and sharing of information really is one of the keys to eliminating waste in the whole supply chain," says Darren Dolcemascolo, senior partner with EMS Consulting Group Inc. (Carlsbad, Calif.) and author of Improving the Extended Value Stream: Lean for the Entire Supply Chain (Productivity Press, 2006). "But you have to overcome the usual paradigm of adversarial relationships with your suppliers. Because once you start talking to suppliers about letting you see and understand their processes, they're going to say, ‘Hey, we don't want you in here looking at our process. None of our other customers are doing that.' It's difficult to overcome that, but you have to start by building trust with all the suppliers in the value stream."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ron Nussle, Jr., C.P.M., who is president of ICR Enterprises, a Union City, Calif.-based procurement and supply chain consultancy, urges companies to apply the Golden Rule to their relationships with suppliers when working with them on Lean or any other initiative. "If your supplier thinks that you have its interests in mind as well, it will be more willing to work with you on continuous improvements and to make investments that help give you better quality, cost, service and on-time delivery," says Nussle, who is co-author, with Jim Morgan, of Integrated Cost Reduction (Reed Business Press, 2004).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That sounds like common sense, of course, but Nussle, who went through extensive supply chain transformations at Honeywell Aerospace, Cessna Aircraft Co. and Lam Research Corp., says it's all too easy to start out with best intentions and then slip back into the "take the savings and run" mentality as an initiative progresses. "You have to keep thinking about what your suppliers' business needs are and how they match your business needs," he says.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One best practice that Management Dynamics' Miles recommends for ensuring consistent alignment of metrics and goals among supply chain partners is to institutionalize regular forums to review the performance of the supply chain as a whole, as well as each individual partner's performance against agreed metrics. The goal, Miles emphasizes, is not to beat up one side or another for failing to meet any specific metrics, but to examine root causes and share best practices for getting that metric back on track. "You really need to engage with your partners to improve the process together rather than just pointing out which metrics were off the plan," Miles says.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Case for Lean&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ironically, even as economic forces are pushing increasing numbers of companies to pursue Lean Supply Chain initiatives, other macro trends are making it increasingly difficult to be successful with such projects. Colin Snow, vice president and research director with Ventana Research, a performance management research and advisory services firm based in San Mateo, Calif., points to increased global sourcing as one such factor. "The minute you go global, you've increased distance and lead times," Snow says. The greater distances make it that much harder to coordinate with suppliers and keep them focused on Lean goals. The increased lead times force companies to constantly make trade-offs between different transportation modes: Putting your goods on a plane costs significantly more, but it reduces the idle time that the goods are in transit, whereas ocean freight costs less but can increase the overall amount of inventory in the supply chain and certainly increases the time that you're holding the inventory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Colin Snow, vice president and research director, Ventana Research&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Still, Snow believes that the imperative for companies to become more agile and flexible — so that they can respond more quickly to changes in demand — is making Lean Supply Chain a mandatory initiative for enterprises. "The consumer is more fickle, and demand is becoming more and more variable, and meanwhile, nobody wants to hold the inventory," he notes. That means that companies sourcing overseas must ensure that their suppliers are running as part of an integrated Lean supply chain, getting parts and products to the dock on time so that ocean freight is a realistic option. It also is true that some companies are revisiting their decision to move their supply base offshore and are instead "near-shoring" some portion of their operations back to nearby countries or domestic locations to meet the most volatile demand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Advocates of Lean emphasize that it is a long-term, ongoing project, a journey, if you will. Lean Manufacturing can be hard enough to implement well because of the requirement to bring multiple functions together from across the enterprise to agree on a universal set of strategies, goals and metrics. Lean Supply Chain only increases the complexity and the difficulty. As WhereNet's Latham says: "These Lean Supply Chain theories have been around for a long time, and people have thought these things through and produced reams of data on how to do it. But the issue isn't that we don't have any ideas on how to do it. The issue is that there are too many parties in the supply chain that have to all agree."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, if it were easy, anyone could do it, and the competitive advantage of doing Lean Supply Chain would disappear, just as the benefits of Lean Manufacturing are diminishing over time as more companies embrace it. For the time being, however, Lean Supply Chain still holds out the promise that it can provide a competitive edge to those enterprises willing to make the investments, and the changes, necessary to begin the journey. Easy? Not a chance. Rewarding? Most likely. A necessity? Absolutely.&lt;/span&gt;</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026/115886182480686790" rel="service.edit" title="Supply chain success requires collaboration" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA6372377.html?industryid=23508" rel="related" title="Supply chain success requires collaboration" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Six Sigma News Update</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-09-22T01:57:00+08:00</issued>
<modified>2006-09-23T00:13:45Z</modified>
<created>2006-09-21T18:03:44Z</created>
<link href="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/2006/09/supply-chain-success-requires.html" rel="alternate" title="Supply chain success requires collaboration" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16295026.post-115886182480686790</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Supply chain success requires collaboration</title>
<content mode="escaped" type="text/html" xml:base="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/" xml:space="preserve">&lt;span style="font-family:arial;"&gt;By Ron Nussle, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;Purchasing&lt;br /&gt;September 21, 2006&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Over the past decade, nearly every Fortune 500 company has embarked on a supply-chain cost-reduction program. Most savings reported come from commodity-leveraged negotiations or sourcing from low-cost countries (LCCs).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Integrated Cost Reduction process uses a broader, more fundamental approach to cost that takes into consideration such factors as engineering, supply, design, marketing, and production. Especially important to the ICR process is how it integrates the proven best-of-the-best business improvement processes: Six Sigma in quality, value analysis/value engineering in design and purchasing, Lean in production, and supply chain management and e-procurement tools in procurement, production, and logistics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The business world goes through one fad after another trying to improve its competitiveness. Over the past few years, the following supply chain cost reduction strategies have been the most common:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Supply chain leveraged negotiations. By themselves, they are typically just “margin-transfer” with four unintended (and often painful) side effects: suppliers recover their losses during the next upturn or engineering change notice; suppliers don't give their best cost ideas up front; suppliers don't recover their losses and exit the industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Outsourcing. There are many benefits, but also substantial costs and risks to outsourcing. Furthermore, outsourcing is not a silver bullet and some products and job functions cannot (or should not) be outsourced. How do you balance the investment in core products and services while simultaneously investing time, resources and management in an outsourcing program? It isn't easy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Global sourcing (to low cost countries). It has become the favorite way for CEOs to lower costs, but takes unexpectedly large investments in time and resources before break even occurs. Typically, break even takes 18-24 months after the project is initiated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Exchanges. They have failed to materialize any real cost savings and have almost all collapsed. A few short years ago, the Big 3 automakers, major airlines, medical companies and a number of other multibillion dollar players launched exchanges with great expectations of cost reductions and many press releases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today, this business model has been almost entirely abandoned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Online reverse auctions. They are really just another form of “win-lose” negotiations. One $5 billion company experienced such a serious backlash after initiating online reverse auctions, it began missing shipments from suppliers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While noncollaborative approaches may yield short-term savings, the above unintended side effects limit the overall benefit to cost of goods sold (COGS). One functional organization (purchasing, tooling services, etc.) may see their numbers get better while other organizations see increases in cost, or degradation in cycle time or quality.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;thead class="head" align="middle"&gt;Outsourcing: Theory vs. experience&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/thead&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;thead class="tfoot" align="middle"&gt;Deloitte Consulting surveyed several companies&lt;br /&gt;on their experiences with outsourcing. Following are some of the&lt;br /&gt;results:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/thead&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;td class="table"&gt;Outsourcing driver&lt;/td&gt; (Experience)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;td class="table"&gt;Cost savings&lt;/td&gt; (52% said cost issues were the main risk, and 81% found hidden costs they had no visibility to in the supplier's pricing.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;td class="table"&gt;Best practice/quality/innovation (&lt;/td&gt;31% said vendors became complacent.)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;td class="table"&gt;Flexibility/capacity/scalability&lt;/td&gt; (Contracts are binding. Late changes are a problem.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;td class="table"&gt;Focus on core/strategic functions&lt;/td&gt; (One in four mislabeled functions as non-strategic.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; )&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr bgcolor="#eeeeee" valign="center"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;td class="table"&gt;Access to high-caliber labor&lt;/td&gt; (One in five saw vendor-employee turnover.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;tr&gt;Source: Deloitte Consulting Outsourcing Study, 2004&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026/115806938458065072" rel="service.edit" title="&quot;Little miracles&quot; in wholesale distribution" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://www.manufacturing.net/ind/index.asp?layout=webOnlineSpecialZine&amp;articleid=CA6369554" rel="related" title="&quot;Little miracles&quot; in wholesale distribution" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Six Sigma News Update</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-09-12T21:55:00+08:00</issued>
<modified>2006-09-12T13:57:40Z</modified>
<created>2006-09-12T13:56:24Z</created>
<link href="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/2006/09/little-miracles-in-wholesale.html" rel="alternate" title="&quot;Little miracles&quot; in wholesale distribution" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16295026.post-115806938458065072</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">"Little miracles" in wholesale distribution</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span style="font-family:arial;">By Howard Coleman<br/>Industrial Distribution September 7, 2006<br/>
<br/>When athletes train, they focus on the fundamentals, first and foremost. They go through a series of concentrated efforts to trim fat, increase flexibility and hone their efforts. The end result is a lean, agile body—ready to take on the rigors of competition.<br/>
<br/>A similar process should apply to all aspects of wholesale distribution. In those organizations that “get lean,” management works with its team of employees to develop a tightly coordinated system—one that is agile, synchronized and responsive to customers. When put into action, “lean” allows companies to serve customers faster, with less space and inventory, lower transaction costs and greater accuracy.<br/>
<br/>If “lean” is an approach that appeals to you, understand that it will not be an overnight process. You will need to re-evaluate your way of thinking, your management style and most likely your processes.<br/>
<br/>A series of processes based on successful lean and continuous improvement implementations have paved the way toward a new approach to performance improvement. These are essential to success, both across the organization and for long-term results, in order to improve key company metrics such as order fill rates, delivery costs, warehouse transaction costs, and inventory levels.<br/>
<br/>The lean and continuous improvement process is an extension of the lean manufacturing concepts that have long provided a framework at giants such as Toyota. Lean thinking concepts can be applied to a variety of sectors such as warehousing, distribution, retailing, order processing, sales, quoting, and customer service.<br/>The best starting point is to recognize that only a small fraction of the total time and effort in any organization actually adds “value” for both internal and external customers. We’ve found that often as much as 60 percent of the activities performed add no value at all. Eliminating the non-value-added activities is the greatest potential source of improvement in a wholesale distributor’s performance.<br/>
<br/>The reduction of non-value-added activities has to be pursued throughout the whole organization and its departments. Only then can a wholesale-distributor understand the real cost structure contained within the “value stream” and focus on optimizing the whole.<br/>
<br/>Lean thinking is exactly what it implies: the conscious, focused effort to objectively examine one’s own workplace. The goals are searching out waste, increasing productivity, lowering total cost and increasing throughput. As part of this search, one must look for evidence of bottlenecks, which limit output, create unneeded inventory and manpower, and get in the way of smooth, accurate and timely operations.<br/>
<br/>Bottlenecks may seem obvious and easy to spot. But many are hidden. What we assume to be a bottleneck may really be an “unconstrained resource,” where output is actually thwarted by a complex or slow process. It may not necessarily be a physical impediment, just an old practice taken for granted, or a bureaucratic or procedural issue.<br/>Using lean thinking as a tool to assess one’s own shop often generates surprising outcomes and can turn constraints into constructive paths for change.<br/>
<br/>The starting point<br/>New relationships are required to eliminate intra- and inter-company waste and to effectively manage the value stream. Activities across the company need to be better synchronized. Instead of managing workload through successive departments and organizations, processes are reorganized so the product or service flows without interruption.<br/>This requires first focusing on the fundamentals and re-engineering the individual processes, which become significant as the individual improvements are linked together.<br/>
<br/>Before heading to where we would like to be, establishing baseline measurements is a key. For instance, if inventory accuracy was an issue, we measured the percent of line items accurate from recent inventories. This way, we had measurements to compare to as we became lean.<br/>Then we introduced “kaizen,” meaning gradual and orderly continuous improvement, another innovation from Toyota. Our teams broke down each and every warehouse and distribution center activity, mapped the processes to examine each one for value, and began to identify the barriers to improvement.<br/>
<br/>Team consensus determined priority. In some cases, we did allow “low hanging fruit” to be given higher priority so the team would have an opportunity for some quick wins. Among the first barriers identified were issues such as:<br/>
<br/>• Lack of personnel training, cross training, and teamwork<br/>• Too many storage locations for the same product<br/>• Poorly sized storage locations<br/>• Fast-moving products not easily accessible and poorly located; i.e., long pick-paths<br/>• Poor vendor/transportation, delivery scheduling<br/>It is not unusual for each team to be able to come up with 30 to 40 or more barriers.<br/>
<br/>For each of the barriers, in priority order, the team developed corrective actions. As solutions were sought, tried and found to be successful, the “kaizen” approach resulted in several “little miracles.” These individually, and then collectively, had significant positive impact on overall performance:<br/>
<br/>• Changes in warehouse storage<br/>• Re-slotting inventory in order to shorten picking travel time<br/>• Rearranging some of the footprint of the warehouse facility<br/>• Multiple order picking process capability<br/>• Personnel assignments and work hours<br/>
<br/>In very few instances, significant capital investment was required. Where warehouse productivity was the issue, increases in picking productivity were 45 percent to 50 percent. Inventory accuracy would jump fairly easily and quickly to 90 percent when the identified root causes were eliminated. Most companies continue to work towards an objective of better than 98 percent accuracy.<br/>
<br/>The participants quickly recognized that the quality of company life improves when you share ideas, implement successful change and then obtain results. Some companies began to roll out this lean approach to other areas of their organization. They addressed issues related to improving the flow of goods from suppliers, including inventory replenishment cycle time, order quantities, and transportation.<br/>
<br/>It is difficult to obtain leading edge performance without technology. But if you are tempted to just add technology, you haven’t solved anything. While there is certainly nothing wrong with using appropriate technology, you will find that the processes must be figured out first. Only then can it be determined how the technology will help.<br/>
<br/>Your company’s mindset<br/>For a successful lean approach, the mindset throughout your company needs to be one of challenging existing practices. A lean approach is an acknowledgement that someone can figure out a better way. It’s a road of discovery to understand operational parameters and maximizing flow.<br/>
<br/>Remember to understand the importance of the organization in the process and that achieving a lean environment takes time. A true lean-thinking organization doesn’t happen in a straight-line fashion. It’s a combination of all the little miracles that will fit together to achieve service excellence and lower total costs.</span>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
<entry xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#">
<link href="https://www.blogger.com/atom/16295026/115805755911590658" rel="service.edit" title="Suppliers join the design huddle" type="application/atom+xml"/>
<link href="http://www.purchasing.com/article/CA6368275.html" rel="related" title="Suppliers join the design huddle" type="text/html"/>
<author>
<name>Lean Six Sigma News Update</name>
</author>
<issued>2006-09-12T18:30:00+08:00</issued>
<modified>2006-09-12T10:39:19Z</modified>
<created>2006-09-12T10:39:19Z</created>
<link href="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/2006/09/suppliers-join-design-huddle.html" rel="alternate" title="Suppliers join the design huddle" type="text/html"/>
<id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16295026.post-115805755911590658</id>
<title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Suppliers join the design huddle</title>
<content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://www.leansigmainstitute.com/news/leansupplychain/" xml:space="preserve">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<span style="font-family:arial;">Teamwork is very important in the supply chain at United Technologies Corp., especially when one of the company's divisions is about to design a new jet engine, an air-conditioning system or a new high-tech elevator.<br/>
<br/>By James Carbone<br/>Purchasing<br/>September 7, 2006<br/>
<br/>Management at UTC knows that having a leading-edge design is not enough, so purchasing and suppliers get involved in design early through the 3P production-planning process.<br/>
<br/>“It is a one-week event that really lays out requirements in terms of manufacturing, logistics and design and gets everyone on the same page,” says Leon Veretto, director of operations analysis (supplier development). The product, its specifications, performance and cost, quality and targets are discussed. The idea is to make sure the product launches successfully.<br/>
<br/>“The 3P process is really attempting to mistake-proof a lot of different things, including the robustness of our design and the robustness of our supply chain,” says Scott Singer, director of supplier management.<br/>
<br/>
<img src="http://www.purchasing.com/articles/images/PUR/20060907/PUR06091medal_Singer.gif"/>
<br/>
<br/>Scott Singer: "We outline our expectations of the supply chain. We would like to see some cost sharing."<br/>
<br/>Purchasing helps select the suppliers that are involved with the 3P. Suppliers must have a needed technology and manufacturing expertise as well as meet UTC's quality and cost goals.<br/>
<br/>Purchasing's involvement in 3P is only part of its involvement in new product introduction. Purchasing also helps select suppliers and involve them with design even before the 3P process begins. Purchasing also evaluates potential new suppliers, especially in Lean manufacturing techniques, and helps them develop through a unique, innovative program called Operations Transformation Leaders (OTL).<br/>
<br/>“Procurement helps bridge our design community and supply base,” says Singer. “Procurement starts in the preliminary design phase when they start to scope out the high level sourcing plan for the products,” he says. That function is done by “strategic sourcing folks within our supply management organization who look at supplier selection,” he says.<br/>
<br/>Know thy supplier<br/>The job of strategic sourcing specialists in supply management is to understand the supply chain capabilities of suppliers and to facilitate a dialogue with them and help determine which suppliers should be involved in new product development.<br/>
<br/>“In the early conceptual design stage before we award business we will bring in suppliers, in some cases competitors, to outline high-level objectives of the projects,” says Singer.<br/>
<br/>This early involvement by suppliers has become important, too, because many of UTC's new programs require significant investments by UTC and suppliers.<br/>
<br/>“We outline expectations of the supply chain. We would like to see some cost sharing,” says Singer. “Our expectations are that they view nonrecurring engineering and hardware development as an investment in the platform. In other words, we want free test hardware to be part of the co-investment of our tier one supply base,” he says.<br/>
<br/>Singer notes that UTC is asked by its customers such as Boeing and Airbus, for the same type of co-investment.<br/>
<br/>These early sessions with suppliers will help UTC determine which suppliers should be considered.<br/>
<br/>“We want to quickly get to the point of who do we believe the players are that we want to heavily engage with on 3P,” says Singer. “At that point, we are making a significant commitment with the supplier on the design and test of the program.”<br/>
<br/>No guarantees<br/>Even though a supplier is selected to participate in 3P, it is no guarantee the supplier's products will be on the bill of materials for a new UTC product. “Suppliers may be switched out during the process,” says Veretto.<br/>
<br/>“In the 3P process, we have found suppliers that may have stood up and said 'we can embrace all these philosophies,' but we discover they did not have the management systems in place to meet our requirements, so we had to make some decisions and swap some of new tier-one suppliers,” he says. “It's much better to have this flushed out in the early phase than after you are launching production purchase orders.”<br/>
<br/>UTC often uses suppliers it has used in the past in the 3P process. “We like to work with our preferred legacy suppliers that have proven themselves on previous platforms,” says Singer. “However, we are always looking for a value proposition that will help us be more competitive in the marketplace.”<br/>
<br/>In some cases, UTC has to use new suppliers because of a transition to a new technology. An example is the Gen2 elevator developed by UTC's Otis Elevator division based in Hartford, Conn.<br/>
<br/>“We essentially created a new supply chain for it,” says Singer.<br/>
<br/>He said new suppliers were necessary because instead of using wire rope in the elevator, the Gen2 uses flat-coated steel-belt technology, a gearless machine and a permanent magnet motor to power it.<br/>
<br/>“It was a joint effort between engineering and procurement in identifying and choosing new suppliers,” says Martin Weichhardt, director of supply chain management at Otis.<br/>
<br/>He says finding a supplier to develop and manufacture coated steel belts was key to the success of the Gen2 elevator.<br/>
<br/>“The coated steel belt has wire strands, molded into a polyurethane type of material. Using the belts rather than wire ropes allowed us to reduce the weight of the elevator tremendously,” says Weichhardt. “A big part of the weight of an elevator is the wire rope itself, which is a steel cord, and there are usually a couple of wire ropes per elevator.”<br/>
<br/>Taking out weight allowed Otis to make an elevator that didn't require a machine room. Instead the electrical controls of the elevator are mounted on top of the elevator cab.<br/>
<br/>Otis considered a number of suppliers for the steel belts, but chose ContiTech of Hanover, Germany because of the company's expertise in the technology and its manufacturing and design capabilities. Later, Otis developed a second source, Brugg Group in Switzerland.<br/>
<br/>When UTC needs to change suppliers and qualify new ones, it evaluates them in two ways. Like many businesses, it has a standard supplier assessment process where suppliers are evaluated on quality, financial stability and manufacturing capability.<br/>
<br/>“But we have also developed a Lean assessment tool where we go to into a supplier with a series of questions and score them in terms of Lean manufacturing,” says Veretto.<br/>
<br/>“We look at quality systems, flow in shop, safety, leadtimes, and capacity. There are eight different elements that we score them on. We look at their management and their competency in terms of Lean and manufacturing,” he says.<br/>
<br/>Singer says other considerations include a supplier's engineering capabilities and a continuous improvement philosophy. “Are they a Six Sigma shop for example? Do they have a type of Toyota production system or a derivative of it?”<br/>
<br/>Based on that assessment, UTC determines if a supplier can “come up to speed” to meet the requirements necessary to be a UTC supplier.<br/>
<br/>If the supplier has a weakness, UTC will work with the supplier to improve with OTL teams.<br/>
<br/>“OTL teams are skilled in Lean and they work with a supplier's specific issues,” says Veretto. OTLs will do value stream mapping at suppliers, examining their processes to identify waste and find ways to eliminate it.<br/>
<br/>Many new suppliers, especially those in emerging markets, may have low-cost manufacturing, but lack robust quality systems and OTL can work with suppliers to improve those systems.<br/>
<br/>“In emerging markets, we are making significant investments in technical assistance because suppliers don't have requisite quality systems or sometimes even business systems to deal with large multinational corporations like UTC,” says Singer.<br/>
<br/>OTL, 3P and early purchasing and supplier involvement is paying off for UTC. It is reducing its number of suppliers and parts on platforms and speeding up assembly time.<br/>
<br/>Case in point: the Pratt &amp; Whitney 600 jet engine, developed in 2005 and used in Cessna, Eclipse and Embraer planes. UTC programs helped to reduce parts count on the engine by 50%, reduce the number of suppliers from 110 to 25 and cut assembly time from eight days to eight hours.<br/>
<br/>
<br/>Elements of Excellence<br/>Involve suppliers early<br/>Evaluate suppliers on Lean, among other criteria<br/>Help suppliers develop themselves<br/>
<br/>The goals of 3P<br/>Deliver customer required design quality.<br/>Reach production volume for expected demand.<br/>Hit target date of market availability.<br/>Attain target cost.<br/>
<br/>Supplier tool reduces risk for UTC<br/>While UTC works closely with suppliers, it is no guarantee that the supplier will be successful in the marketplace and continue to be financially healthy. To monitor suppliers' financial performance, UTC uses an online tool that sends up early warning signs if a supplier starts to get into financial hot water.<br/>
<br/>UTC uses a risk management tool called SBManager, developed by Open Ratings, a Dun and Bradstreet company.<br/>
<br/>
<img src="http://www.purchasing.com/articles/images/PUR/20060907/PUR06091medal_Leon.gif"/>
<br/>
<br/>Leon Veretto: "Operations Transformation Leader teams are skilled in Lean and they work with a supplier's specific issues."<br/>“It is a pattern-recognition model,” says Leon Veretto, director of operations analysis. “It looks at past bankruptcies of suppliers and the events that lead up to the bankruptcies and patterns them in terms of three months before and six months before. It analyzes the types of things that were happening with the supplier.”<br/>
<br/>He says UTC monitors 25,000 suppliers with this tool. “When a supplier starts replicating a pattern that is consistent with other companies that have gone bankrupt, it gives you an early alert,” says Veretto. “It gives you a heads-up months before there is an issue and you can intervene.”<br/>
<br/>Intervention can involve talking with the suppliers about the financial issues and helping the supplier correct them or dropping the supplier from a project.<br/>
<br/>UTC has used the tool to prevent delay of launching of a new product.<br/>
<br/>Scott Singer, director of supplier management, said a couple of years ago a new supplier was selected because the supplier had a new high-speed machining technology for helicopter frames. “We had selected this supplier because the supplier was new and had differentiated itself with the technology,” he says.<br/>
<br/>“Things started to go badly with the supplier and the tool alerted us that the supplier was in financial trouble. It gave us a six to eight week advantage over other customers of this supplier to take corrective action,” he says. UTC found another source and the supplier went bankrupt.<br/>
<br/>Jim Lawton, vice president of marketing for Open Ratings in Waltham, Mass., says about 40 companies use SBManager and it has a success rate of 92% at predicting bankruptcies of companies six months ahead of time.<br/>
<br/>He says the tool identifies supplier problems, such as failing to pay their own suppliers, legal issues and problems meeting government and environmental regulations.</span>
</div>
</content>
<draft xmlns="http://purl.org/atom-blog/ns#">false</draft>
</entry>
</feed>
